🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “total contradiction” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders demands proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting modifications of a proposed legislation that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” said Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from tobacco-related illnesses, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. Last month, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of corporate influence worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The tobacco control bill progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

In the letter, BAT suggests this be lowered to 30% or 50% “following international suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum twelve months after the bill passes.

International experts in fact recommends a warning should cover at least 50% of the product container front “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on scented smoking items, arguing that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for various offences “extending from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the managing director of the Zambian branch states the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but maintains that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated BAT’s proposed changes would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We reside in a connected world. If I plant tobacco in my back yard and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the Britain or other nations had not resulted in corporate closures, Chimbala said. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator stated: “The company operates its activities following with current country statutes. Moreover, the company participates in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The company was “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, mentioning that underage people should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to accomplish desired community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of rights and obligations on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the representative explained, adding that BAT’s proposals “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which includes rising levels of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.