Rachel Reeves Confronts A Major Challenge: This Brexit Dilemma
The chancellor has tackled the upcoming financial plan similar to a hesitant bather inching into icy water, striving to mitigate the unpleasantness through gradual exposure.
Early Steps and Revenue Promises
She began tackling the issue of limited revenue at the end of summer. To begin with, she declined to stand by former insistence that increases in taxation in last year's financial statement would be the last ones.
Later, recently, she took a larger stride into the icy waters. A speech vowed to "take required actions" to finance state services and control borrowing costs under control.
Election Pledge and Government Retreat
After 10 days, the Treasury had retracted the hint. The manifesto commitment was upheld in the end. Like every cold-water swimmer understands, this aborted plunge and shivering withdrawal is the most painful of all methods. Nothing prolongs the discomfort like indecision.
It can be hard to be firm when selecting between types of personally caused harm.
Optimism as Plan
Optimism has not been a great strategy for this government. At the core of the Labour leader's election bid was the vain hope of by some means fulfilling voters' demand for better government services without overturning significant amounts of Conservative reductions in taxation.
Messaging Shortcoming
Never has either Starmer or Reeves adequately communicated a sense of shared mission to validate all this pain. In part that is a issue of leadership presence. Both leaders are uncannily alike in their poor communication skills, stilted and unforthcoming in a way that drives listeners off instead of pulling them towards them.
EU Exit Settlement and Economic Truth
Similarly to electoral expectations to support public services has forced the Treasury to concede that taxes must increase, the economic imperative of improving growth makes it more challenging to overlook the price of disconnection from the EU market.
European Relationship and Talks
The government devoted a twelve months experimenting in the initial phase of closer ties with the European Union: plans to eliminate customs checks on agricultural goods; a student movement initiative. Vision went a further on power generation, armed forces partnership, but no significant agreements has to date been finalized.
Diplomatic Reality and Global Position
Lacking specific instruction and drive from the prime minister's office, talks are stuck. The European Commission says trading benefits are obtained with financial input to the EU budget. Government representatives understand that's the deal. That doesn't cause them keen for a public row and campaigners howling disloyalty over whatever price ends up being agreed.
Financial Harm and Government Terminology
Financial circumstances has provoked some shift in the administration's tone on the continental partnership. Reeves has started citing EU withdrawal alongside the Covid pandemic as a cause of economic damage that the finance ministry is working hard to repair. Government colleagues have done the same, although they carefully assign the fault to "poor negotiation terms" or "the exit process", never just "withdrawal".
International Context and Long-term Possibilities
The issue of the UK's future relationship with the European Union can't be limited to administrative modifications and customs systems when the entire international system is in significant transformation. Given everything that has occurred since the referendum year, it feels reasonable still to be posing the big question: were the nation's concerns advanced by leaving the European Union?
Conclusion
These constitute cold, uncomfortable truths about the UK's position in choppy global circumstances. It is not surprising that Starmer and Reeves recoil from the task. It would take them beyond their capabilities, into trends that they dare not oppose. So instead they carry on apprehensively pacing the water's edge, hoping that maybe soon the circumstances will turn.