🔗 Share this article

Recently, Battlefield Studios launched a new playlist titled Casual Breakthrough. To put it simply, this mode resembles the standard Breakthrough format but includes several notable adjustments:

• Every squad includes just 8 human participants, with the rest filled by AI-controlled opponents.
• Activities done by real players grant complete experience points, while AI activities offer lower rewards.
• Just a pair of maps can be played: Cairo Siege and Empire State map.
• Features like Dogtags, achievements, and stat tracking have been turned off.

So essentially, this mode delivers on its title: it offers a laid-back version of Breakthrough. On the surface, you might think it's a good idea, since it gives additional choices for gamers seeking different ways to enjoy the game. But, if video games have taught us anything, it is that you can't please everyone. In other words, a lot of BF6 players are upset.

Player Responses: From Fury to Praise

"People want real players. Avoid making the errors of your competitors," states a response to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing concept," says another. Meanwhile, on the Battlefield subreddit, one user remarks, "It's unclear where we are headed with this game," and someone else lists all the issues they believe to be problematic in the game: "Resolve glitches, address drone issues, correct rocket mechanics, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We don't need this bot mode."

However, amid the criticism, some gamers sharing how much they're liking the new mode. "It's enjoyable to practice, human participants prevent it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," says one Reddit comment. "This subreddit fails to see that there are gamers who actually go outside and can't play this title all the time. Allow them to find a middle ground," states a different comment. One reply via social media explains that as they're "a parent gamer with busy schedules, this is great for me," while another applauds the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Valid Criticisms and Player Input

Despite the support, players have valid points to criticize Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have pointed out that it will make queue times more extended for different playlists due to the large amount of options in the game already. Similarly, certain regions often face AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. Additionally, it appears a little backwards that the mode won't start without a minimum number of human gamers, even though it primarily centers on fighting AI opponents.

Finally, one of the biggest grievances is that Battlefield Portal was promised to provide complete rewards, even against bots, but that got canned when they tried to remove XP farming from the mode. So Casual Breakthrough feels like the player base meeting them halfway, according to forum feedback. A different user describes this addition as the developers "making a mistake significantly, I experienced great enjoyment in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to adjust it?"

Looking Ahead: Will Changes Be Made?

Should Battlefield Studios has proven anything to date with the latest installment, it is that they're paying attention and responding to feedback. Assignments that were overly hard were adjusted very quickly, just like the required Redsec challenges. It is likely that, if their data indicates this recent mode isn't performing to their expectations, they won't be shy to change it again.